NHS Continuing Healthcare: why it’s important to have a coordinator
Claiming NHS Continuing Healthcare in the UK is an uphill struggle. Our expert Roger Burgess explains why it’s so important to ensure an independent coordinator is appointed.
Before you begin
Find out more about NHS Continuing Healthcare and why your parent might claim it if they have complex health needs by reading Roger’s first two articles.
Download the National Framework for NHS Continuing Healthcare & NHS Funded Nursing Care and have it to hand. You’ll also need the Decision Support Tool mentioned in this article.
What does a coordinator do?
Many individuals go into their assessments for NHS Continuing Healthcare (CHC) with very limited or no understanding of the procedures. The coordinator’s role in the CHC assessment procedure is a vital part of that process. They should ensure that the individuals and/or their representatives receive a clear and proper understanding of how the continuing healthcare system works.
The coordinator has a duty of care towards the individual and their representatives, keeping them informed on all points shown on page 71 paragraph 26.4 of the National Framework for NHS Continuing Healthcare & NHS Funded Nursing Care. They should schedule the Multi-Disciplinary Team (MDT) meeting and ensure that a fair, robust and above all transparent assessment takes place, whilst also ensuring that the framework is being adhered to at all times.
When a coordinator is assigned they can help control most of the assessment complaints that can lead to unnecessary conflict between NHS/CHC staff and the individuals or their family members, as well as creating additional and unnecessary stress on the patients themselves.
However, there appears to be certain influences at work within some NHS/CHC areas that insist on trying to move goal posts, often creating flawed policy in their wake. This then starts to create even more problems and complex issues, which involves further time-consuming and costly interventions to resolve.
Many complaints could be avoided simply by ensuring that MDT members carry out their duties correctly and in accordance with the framework, by, for example, ensuring that at least two member from different NHS disciplines attend the meeting in order to form part of a legitimate MDT. Sadly this is not always the case. Once again this should be part of the coordinator’s role as they also has a duty to attend the meeting themselves. Failure to attend and assume their proper responsible position means that they are unable to comply with page 15 paragraph 34 of the Decision Support Tool.
Page 71 paragraph 26.3 of the Framework explains how there should be an appropriate separation between the coordinator and those responsible for making the final decision on eligibility. (In this respect the decision makers are of course the MDT members, because they make the recommendations which the CCG’s should accept, “except in exceptional circumstances”). It is thereforethe duty of the CCG to ensure that this appropriate separation is maintained.
The coordinator should ensure that the Decision Support Tool (DST) is completed correctly before it is signed off by MDT members at the end of the meeting. It is not good practice to change part of the DST after it has been signed off.It should remain consistent with the recommendations made at the MDT meeting. (Sometimes changes do mysteriously take place, and the individual and/or their representatives only find out when they receive their copy of the DST, normally by post.)
It is the duty of the coordinator to present the signed DST along with its recommendations to the CCG panel for final confirmation.
As mentioned earlier, when the MDT recommendation is received by the CCG they should accept that recommendation. Only in exceptional circumstances would this not apply, for example, incomplete domain information to support a particular care need.
However, if the coordinator is carrying out their function correctly they would ensure that all necessary information pertaining to the individual has been gathered from all potential sources prior to the meeting -normally a 28 day period allows for this to take place prior to the MDT meeting. Therefore problems of this nature should not arise. This is just another reason why it is so important to have a coordinator assigned to each case.
NHS CHC Governance and Assurance
According to the NHS continuing healthcare “Governance and Assurance”, the process to determine eligibility for NHS funding under continuing healthcare is defined in the national framework and associated tools. These are the processes that must be applied in all cases when determining eligibility and there should be no deviation from them.
The Right to Appeal
Everyone retains the right of appeal against a decision made by the MDT members or the CCG panel and there are procedures and timetables in place for this phase of the eligibility process.
However, it can sometimes be confusing and individuals are often left to find out for themselves, or in many cases they just don’t appeal.
As stated earlier, if the coordinator carried out their duties as required in accordance with the framework, there would be less room for errors or complaints from the individual or their representatives, which in turn would save the NHS so much valuable time and money.
Until the national framework is officially amended, the coordinator will continue to be the key to the Continuing Healthcare structure.
Without the assignment of a coordinator the whole CHC process will fail in its legitimacy to function in accordance with the framework. Once a recommendation has been made for a full assessment to take place, no individual should be denied or not provided with full access to the services of a coordinator. Otherwise the system is in danger of failing to operate correctly and many unforeseen and unnecessary problems will no doubt start to emerge throughout the assessment process.
Guidance and checklists can be found in these downloads and having copies of these documents to hand will help understand the process:
- National Framework for NHS Continuing Healthcare & NHS Funded Nursing Care
- Decision Support Tool for NHS Continuing Healthcare November 2012 (Revised)
- Check List for NHS Continuing Healthcare November 2012 (Revised)
- NHS Continuing Healthcare Refreshed Redress Guidance (Gateway Ref: 03261)
- Equality Analysis (revised November 2012)
The National framework and its associated tools are underpinned by legally binding directions and standing rules. This is laid down in the NHS England "Guide for Health and Social Care Practitioners" publication, page 4 Para 2.4 refers.
This article was published in February 2016.
Roger Burgess is happy to answer any questions you might have on NHS Continuing Healthcare. You can contact him by email on firstname.lastname@example.org or by calling 01288 381397 or 07798 902693.Become a member for Free